Tuesday, May 31, 2011

heidi montag playboy

heidi montag playboy. know how much Heidi Montag
  • know how much Heidi Montag


  • Calidude
    Apr 16, 05:13 PM
    This is no value to me, if you consider your position to be narrow-mind, and not an abomination, sorry...., affront.
    Make more sense. This sentence of yours makes none.




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag Playboy September
  • Heidi Montag Playboy September


  • ezekielrage_99
    Aug 10, 08:44 PM
    I thought the Apple Displays might sport an iSight Camera....

    Still uping the specs and dropping the price is enough for me :cool:




    heidi montag playboy. aheidi montag Heidi
  • aheidi montag Heidi


  • lordonuthin
    Jul 22, 11:21 AM
    i pay $130aus a month ($~110 US) for 50GB of downloads! (adsl2+). at least i hit the speeds.

    are you on cable lord?

    Yes I'm on cable, I did have dsl a couple of years ago but the company couldn't offer anything faster than 10gb/s at a higher price.




    heidi montag playboy. HeidiMontagPlayboy
  • HeidiMontagPlayboy


  • MacinDoc
    Nov 24, 12:17 AM
    Well, the Apple Canada store is back up, but I haven't found any discounts on iMacs or iBooks yet.



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. heidi montag playboy pictures
  • heidi montag playboy pictures


  • ezekielrage_99
    Jan 14, 11:26 PM
    I think they'll be barred after this....

    http://gizmodo.com/344673/do-you-really-think-the-macworld-keynotes-leaked-on-wikipedia




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag. Photo by Playboy
  • Heidi Montag. Photo by Playboy


  • 8CoreWhore
    May 2, 02:22 PM
    Not that I really care about the tracking services...but I wonder if Apple will skip the 3G again with this update...

    If not, encrypt your backups in iTunes on your computer (that's where the greatest threat lies).



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag to pose nude for
  • Heidi Montag to pose nude for


  • vendettabass
    Nov 16, 04:33 PM
    Nope. Wouldn't put the store down at 5:30 pm on a Thursday (EST) for maintenance. My money is on either a major failure (unlikely) or a PRODUCT(RED) MacBook.

    EDIT:

    Or, come to think of it, Quad Core Mac Pros.

    awe dude now ive gotta stay up and find out! (its 10:30pm UK time!)




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag Pratt Playboy
  • Heidi Montag Pratt Playboy


  • balamw
    Apr 27, 07:04 PM
    My sources.. well, my main sources is the Apple documentation (all of it), then theres books and all the same stuff than most developers learn from. And.. no I haven't read all of the books, nor watch every video but I will.

    Again with the lack of specificity. :rolleyes:

    Being specific is a huge part of learning how to program, because computers only do what you tell them to do. (As you should have learned just by living through this thread).

    It's not essential to read every page of every book, but certain books are good at explaining particular concepts. Others, less so.

    Telling us specifically which resources got you in this mess, can help us point you at the relevant portions of the resources you already have at your disposal. It also can help us the next newbie who doesn't know a method from an object instance, by pointing them to different resources to avoid your mistakes.

    For example, if we know you have access to Kochan's book we could be more specific and say: "Go back and re-read Chapter 3 on "Classes, Objects and Methods"" instead of a more generic "step back and learn the fundamentals".


    No, self refers to the instance of the object that is executing the currently running code.

    Which Nekbeth might actually know if they took the time to learn something about objects, for example from said Chapter 3 in Kochan. For me, it remains the best description of objects I have read.

    B



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. heidi montag playboy cover 2
  • heidi montag playboy cover 2


  • JKK photography
    Apr 8, 05:09 PM
    You can say that about any consumer product.
    Speaking in general terms, MS has added more to windows, improved performance and reduced the bloat with win7.

    Apple has gone the opposite direction, adding bloat and no major feature since 10.5

    So 10.6 is bloated?

    I would say that Windows 7 has very few new features, compared to Windows Vista. It was a performance/stability upgrade.

    I would say that Snow Leopard has very few new features, compared to Leopard. It was a performance/stability upgrade.

    Now, one of last-gen OS' actually needed a big boost in the performance/stability department. One didn't.

    I simply don't agree with you. Snow Leopard was a few GBs smaller than Leopard, and was faster... and yet you say it is bloated?




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag
  • Heidi Montag


  • ericschmerick
    Sep 25, 06:17 PM
    It still is pretty poor with compatibility when it comes to RAW. For example, it still can't read white balance from the meta data on RAW files off Canon cameras. Great!

    Aperture's development also is going slow. Apple pulling out the software?

    Perhaps all the developers are spending too much time on Leopard and Logic 8 at the moment.

    Huh? Reads white balance fine from my 20d and 10d raw files.

    I'm surprised at how responsive Apple has been with updates to Aperture. When the product first came out, there was huge scrutiny of the RAW conversion quality and long list of other critical image processing things (like RGB value reporting) - within a very short time, they updated it and solved the vast majority of those issues. The other big knock was file handling - now they've fixed that. The file handling in particular had to be a pretty significant rework of the code. Furthermore, they've updated the app to universal. I'd say that's a pretty blazing pace of development.

    Eric
    http://www.essersinchina.com/



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag 4
  • Heidi Montag 4


  • milo
    Oct 6, 10:23 AM
    Apple needs to start working on a new business model while the studios are still suing their customers and the TV boom is still on. If they dont they're going to be beaten overseas. Enough with the legal rhetoric damn it, evolve your business model or you'll lose.

    Beaten overseas by who? Who is making it big selling TV shows overseas?

    good lord, if anyone actually got through reading all this, can there be any doubt left that all consumers want is DRM-free content??? There's a simple rule that exists - the more complicated the DRM you put on your content, the less likely that people are going to buy it. Hence, people are downloading music and movies for free, and ripping Netflix DVDs to their hard drives to burn their own copies.

    You can't put the genie back in the bottle. Until there's DRM-free movies and music for sale online, so-called pirated downloads will continue to dwarf legal downloads. End of story.

    Wow, that's incredibly naive. People don't get free content because the free content is "simpler". It's because they're too cheap to pay. If people want no drm, they can just buy cd's and dvd's and rip them. People who download free content, or rip rented discs are just cheapskates who are stealing.

    There IS DRM free music for sale online. And in contrast to your theory, people are still stealing it.

    Whom are you kidding? Nobody cares that Fairplay's DRM is better than other DRM. Do you think it being "successful" (and that word ONLY applies comparing it to other pay services, not overall downloads) has anything to do with the fact that 70% of all mp3 players are ipods, and only work with the itms?

    But if iTunes' DRM was annoying to users, it never would have made it to 70%. Users absolutely care about DRM. But they're not aware of it unless it's too restrictive or inconvenient - if you give them *bad* DRM they will totally notice it and hate it.




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag to pose naked for
  • Heidi Montag to pose naked for


  • raymondkerr
    Apr 9, 01:26 PM
    Fully aware of the fakes around, my beats are the early solo version (not HD). I have heard all the stories about them being fragile. I'm careful with my gear so I'm hoping I don't have a problem.

    Mines are from a legit UK distributor - so I don't have to worry about fakes. I much prefer the matt finish to the Glossy HD ones.
    :)



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag Playboy Photo
  • Heidi Montag Playboy Photo


  • caspersoong
    Apr 29, 09:07 PM
    Will the Macbook Air 2011 get it? Hope so.




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag
  • Heidi Montag


  • islesguy81
    Mar 25, 12:24 AM
    Happy Birthday! :apple:;)



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag#39;s Playboy Cover
  • Heidi Montag#39;s Playboy Cover


  • PhoneyDeveloper
    Apr 26, 10:22 PM
    Nekbeth, you didn't thank Philip Endecott, who posted the solution to your problem on the Apple forum about three hours before wlh99 posted essentially the same solution here.




    heidi montag playboy. Ryan Cut Up Heidi Montag
  • Ryan Cut Up Heidi Montag


  • wako
    Mar 30, 02:00 AM
    dammit!


    I was hoping letting this thread pan out for a few days I could read an amazing story and have a good ending... too bad this isnt the case yet...



    I really do hope you catch them. Its pretty amazing how you might be able to get your Xbox back from Connect360. If you do end up catching them you should email the developer and tell him your amazing story. Not only can it connect your 360 to your mac, but it also is able to catch crooks ;)



    more...

    heidi montag playboy. heidi-montag-playboy-photos-06
  • heidi-montag-playboy-photos-06


  • ThaDoggg
    Apr 13, 01:33 PM
    There's a use for Apple (they can sell you both the adapter and the DVI cable, at 40$ each) ;)

    :D Exactly. I think not alot of people know that you can bypass the adapter altogether. Not only would it be cheaper but it would take away from the bulk.




    heidi montag playboy. HEIDI Montag, the US TV
  • HEIDI Montag, the US TV


  • p8ntballguy
    Oct 10, 09:48 PM
    i made a quick mockup of what it could be like, i left out some details. I changed the dvd icon to a mail/gtube one(youtube) because it supossdly has wi-fi.....opinions?

    http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/374/ipodmockzr0.jpg




    heidi montag playboy. Heidi Montag: Playboy Magazine
  • Heidi Montag: Playboy Magazine


  • flottenheimer
    Apr 16, 02:43 PM
    Wishing for a matte black plastic finish on the next iPhone.




    Full of Fail
    May 3, 03:57 PM
    Considering communism is dependent on control of the resources so they can be equally doled out, it's not free and open. You're thinking of anarchy.
    Your username is appropriate. :rolleyes:

    I was referring to things that work in theory and not in practice. Now that you have me going about it though, communism is, in theory, open and in practice, not open. You are describing the practice of it, not the theory. Thanks for proving my point.




    Prom1
    Mar 24, 09:42 PM
    I was there at the beginning - in & out 3 times.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko4V3G4NqII

    OS X you've been the Apple of my eye since the beginning!
    :apple:




    ArchaicRevival
    Apr 29, 07:38 PM
    What are you talking about? The screenshots shown here are from the latest developer release of the software, meaning that anything you see is already implemented in code and being used by registered Mac OS developers the world over.

    Sarcasm dude...




    applebum
    Aug 5, 12:09 PM
    I was thinking, ( always a dangerous activity).

    There IS one thing that could make me switch over to the cross platform compatibility side of this argument.

    That would be if the CC of Norway enforced it ACROSS THE BOARD!

    My first MP3 player was a Creative Zen Micro. The only reason I have an iPod is because when I switched to Macs, the nice people at Creative Labs informed me that their sync software DID NOT SUPPORT MAC OS.

    I can't even access Sony's Connect music store on my Mac. I'm told I need to "upgrade to Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher". (Upgrade to IE??? Bwahahahahaha!!! Those silly wabbits. :D)

    I have a couple of programs I used in my PC days that are completely useless now, they won't run on Mac OS. Why not? I bought them! I paid for them! What right do these software companies have to lock me into a single platform?

    I have, at last count, 317 files on my comp with the extension .xls. If I should decide I prefer to use Lotus, will I be able to open these files as is? Or will I have to take the time to convert them to XML format? Will I lose any of the custom formatting these files contain? ( I honestly don't know. I'm just beginning to learn the ODF stuff. Beside, current version of Lotus appears to be Windows only!) And these files aren't something I paid for, they are my own creations!

    I'd be more than willing to see Apple surrender some iPod sales, (given the quality of the product, I don't think it would be much), if it would remove the single largest block against switching to Mac OS; the availabilty of software! Then the OS's could compete on other planes; features, ease of use, quality of computing experience, stability, etc. All of which would be, dare I say, good for the consumer?

    Maybe I'm just a silly dreamer, but imagine the boon to Mac and Linux users if all these software development companies were forced to make their products interoperable, with the same functionality, and price.

    What a beautiful place the world would be! :cool:

    dsnort - finally, someone has hit the nail on the head. A standard DRM does not help ALL consumers - only those using Windows. This is why I see these rules/laws as fluff. There has to be 2 parts to any law before I will see it as positive. First - the law must insist on OS Neutrality. Meaning, if you want to have an online music store, it must work on Linux, Mac, and Windows. You make a music player, then it must have drivers or work on Linux, Mac and Windows. Once you have that, then let's get a universal DRM that is used by all these music stores and all these music players. Until both things happen, these laws do not help all consumers. And isn't what these laws are supposed to do - help the consumer???

    My household has nothing but Macs. If these "laws" were enacted and we suddenly had a universal DRM, it would NOT help me as a consumer. I would still only be able to use iTunes, as none of the other big music stores (Sony, Yahoo, Napster, Real, Microsoft, Walmart) work on a Mac. I could perhaps buy a different player, but that would only help if that player had drivers or software that would work on a Mac.

    These "laws" seemed to be created by Windows using politicians who don't truly understand what it would take to be fair to ALL consumers. It seems that they only care about whether Windows users get all the bells, whistles, and benefits. So I say leave it the way it is until it will help everyone.




    archipellago
    Apr 5, 03:02 PM
    Desperate is as desperate does...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment