rajenk
02-10 02:09 PM
That could be things like
NOID - Notice of intend to Deny.
RFE - Request for evidence.
For I-140 USCIS does not update the online status properly. For both of my EB3 and EB2 I-140s still the case status says they received the application and processing!
Wait for the document that they sent.
NOID - Notice of intend to Deny.
RFE - Request for evidence.
For I-140 USCIS does not update the online status properly. For both of my EB3 and EB2 I-140s still the case status says they received the application and processing!
Wait for the document that they sent.
wallpaper shoot. emma watson vogue
letstalklc
10-14 11:57 AM
See the comments below, keep in mind it's my personnel opinion...
Hi all,
I am in the middle of H1-B transfer from Comp A to Comp B.. I have an urgent question,
Company A didn't run my payroll from 11/26/07-4/11/08 because i was out of the project,since then i have had a consistent payroll no gaps, my question is
1.will that affect my H1-b transfer?
I dont think it will affect as per my knowledge, in verst case, they might ask for your 2008 W2 from the old company and I assume that you had on payroll from May to year end, so you can show that if they ask
2.will USCIS go back that far to verify my paystubs?, and
Normall they will go back to 6 months max, but be prepare to submit the Client letter to prove that you have project for next couple of years, keep in mind that if you show client letter for only few months, USCIS is will issue only for that period, it happened for couple of guys....these days proof of project is a key for transfers...good luck....
Please Please Please reply , if possible any attorneys
Thanks in Advance
Anuj
Hi all,
I am in the middle of H1-B transfer from Comp A to Comp B.. I have an urgent question,
Company A didn't run my payroll from 11/26/07-4/11/08 because i was out of the project,since then i have had a consistent payroll no gaps, my question is
1.will that affect my H1-b transfer?
I dont think it will affect as per my knowledge, in verst case, they might ask for your 2008 W2 from the old company and I assume that you had on payroll from May to year end, so you can show that if they ask
2.will USCIS go back that far to verify my paystubs?, and
Normall they will go back to 6 months max, but be prepare to submit the Client letter to prove that you have project for next couple of years, keep in mind that if you show client letter for only few months, USCIS is will issue only for that period, it happened for couple of guys....these days proof of project is a key for transfers...good luck....
Please Please Please reply , if possible any attorneys
Thanks in Advance
Anuj
Malayka
01-18 07:40 PM
Thanks bluesoft for your response. I was thinking of the same thing but if i do renewal of green card is there a federal background check, if there is i might be rejected that as well.
Any suggestions??? thank you
Any suggestions??? thank you
2011 hairstyles emma watson vogue
jonty_11
12-04 02:06 PM
INteresting news on Times
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/H1-B_visas_A_booster_coming/articleshow/3791756.cms
Should we contact her for GC backlogs also....IV core can comment!!
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/H1-B_visas_A_booster_coming/articleshow/3791756.cms
Should we contact her for GC backlogs also....IV core can comment!!
more...
sukhwinderd
11-23 10:02 AM
i was trying to understand how many visas are available for recapture.
here is what i found
Legal Permanent Resident Flow by Major Category of Admission: Fiscal Years 2007 to 2009
source - dept of homeland security.
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/lpr_fr_2009.pdf
2009 2008 2007
Category of admission Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Employment-based preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144,034 12.7 166,511 15.0 162,176 15.4
Priority workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,924 3.6 36,678 3.3 26,697 2.5
Professionals with advanced degrees . . . . . . . . . . . 45,552 4.0 70,046 6.3 44,162 4.2
Skilled workers, professionals, unskilled workers . . . . 40,398 3.6 48,903 4.4 85,030 8.1
Special immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,472 1.2 9,524 0.9 5,481 0.5
Investors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,688 0.3 1,360 0.1 806 0.1
for years 2009 2008 2007 -> 144,034 166,511 162,176 GC has been issued for EB categories.
from this report it seems like all the visa numbers are being used already atleast for years 2007-2009
i am assuming there were some visas lost before 2007. does anyone has any links justifying that.
here is what i found
Legal Permanent Resident Flow by Major Category of Admission: Fiscal Years 2007 to 2009
source - dept of homeland security.
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/lpr_fr_2009.pdf
2009 2008 2007
Category of admission Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Employment-based preferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144,034 12.7 166,511 15.0 162,176 15.4
Priority workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,924 3.6 36,678 3.3 26,697 2.5
Professionals with advanced degrees . . . . . . . . . . . 45,552 4.0 70,046 6.3 44,162 4.2
Skilled workers, professionals, unskilled workers . . . . 40,398 3.6 48,903 4.4 85,030 8.1
Special immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,472 1.2 9,524 0.9 5,481 0.5
Investors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,688 0.3 1,360 0.1 806 0.1
for years 2009 2008 2007 -> 144,034 166,511 162,176 GC has been issued for EB categories.
from this report it seems like all the visa numbers are being used already atleast for years 2007-2009
i am assuming there were some visas lost before 2007. does anyone has any links justifying that.
Anders �stberg
December 17th, 2003, 03:52 PM
Thanks guys!
Most of the time I don't really like photos that are processed with canned Photoshop effects, they are either too obvoiusly based on a photo or not "handmade" enough. I think by chance (I tried one efter the other just for fun and to see what they did) I stumbled on an effect ("Diffuse Glow" distortion effect in CS) that surprisingly gave this sort of painting or water color look. I tried it on some other photos and it just made a total mess of them. It just somehow worked for this specific picture.
Most of the time I don't really like photos that are processed with canned Photoshop effects, they are either too obvoiusly based on a photo or not "handmade" enough. I think by chance (I tried one efter the other just for fun and to see what they did) I stumbled on an effect ("Diffuse Glow" distortion effect in CS) that surprisingly gave this sort of painting or water color look. I tried it on some other photos and it just made a total mess of them. It just somehow worked for this specific picture.